RSS icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon
Vimeo icon
YouTube icon

Elastic rate coefficients for Li+H-2 collisions in the calibration of a cold-atom vacuum standard

TitleElastic rate coefficients for Li+H-2 collisions in the calibration of a cold-atom vacuum standard
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuthorsC. Makrides, D. S. Barker, J. A. Fedchak, J. Scherschligt, S. Eckel, and E. Tiesinga
JournalPhys. Rev. A
Volume99
Pagination042704
Date PublishedAPR 29
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN2469-9926
Abstract

Ongoing efforts at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in creating a cold-atom vacuum standard device have prompted theoretical investigations of atom-molecule collision processes that characterize its operation. Such a device will operate as a primary standard for the ultrahigh-vacuum and extreme-high-vacuum regimes. This device operates by relating loss of ultracold lithium atoms from a conservative trap by collisions with ambient atoms and molecules to the background density and thus pressure through the ideal gas law. The predominant background constituent in these environments is molecular hydrogen H-2. We compute the relevant Li+H-2 Born-Oppenheimer potential energy surface, paying special attention to its uncertainty. Coupled-channel calculations are then used to obtain total rate coefficients, which include momentum-changing elastic and inelastic processes. We find that inelastic rotational quenching of H-2 is negligible near room temperature. For a (T = 300)-K gas of H-2 and 1.0-mu K gas of Li atoms prepared in a single hyperfine state, the total rate coefficients are 6.0(1) x 10(-9) cm(3)/s for both Li-6 and Li-7 isotopes, where the number in parentheses corresponds to a one-standard-deviation combined statistical and systematic uncertainty. We find that a 10-K increase in the H-2 temperature leads to a 1.9% increase in the rate coefficients for both isotopes. For Li temperatures up to 100 mu K, changes are negligible. Finally, a semiclassical Born approximation significantly overestimates the rate coefficients. The difference is at least ten times the uncertainty of the coupled-channel result.

DOI10.1103/PhysRevA.99.042704